Science is at the center of all of Alex Garland’s activities, but the writer-director has less interest in theories than he has expressed about humanity. By David Deutsch and David Wallace Physicists began to be seen by the speech. The result of this growing obsession is, years later, on “Devs,” a self-contained, eight-episode series for FX on Hulu, which Garland followed in 2018 after “Annihilation.”
“What happens to me is that I’m interested in a particular subject and then at one time only one story falls on that topic,” said Garland, who sat on the set of “Devas” in London last year. Goes on and the story comes later. Most of the time when the story comes out it is fully formed – it comes down to the whole narrative. This happened exactly with this one.
“This idea originated from whether we live in an innocent universe or a neutral world – a senseless universe, meaning a universe where everything is the result of a prior cause. And the philosophical implication for this is that it removes free will. If this is true, then that’s a big deal. It forces you to re-think behavior, which means you rethink relationships and actions that you did right or wrong. “
Garland wrote and directed all eight episodes, followed by a coder named Lily Chan (Sonia Mizuno, who also appeared on “Ex Machina”) who works for a Silicon Valley tech company called Amaya. A series of events lead Lily deeper into the secret lab on the Amaya campus, known as the Devas – “short for development”. Saying too much about this plot will ruin the unfolding story, but it is enough to know that the Divas holds a powerful quantum computer that has the potential to change our understanding of the universe. Nick Offerman plays the chief executive of Amer, a suspected motive, and Allison Peel portrays Katie, his sharp right-handed woman.
Although the show is currently set, the technology it displays reflects some assumptions, pushing past what is currently possible.
Garland notes, “It has some similarities with ‘X Machina’, which is kind of 10 years in the future.” In the same way, ‘ex machina’ can really happen, which is to say it probably didn’t happen, but something like that could happen. Bay quantum computer could flow easily “”
Prior to the shooting with director Mizuno, Goleta visited Google’s quantum computer lab in California and did extensive research at the time of writing. He found the YouTube series “PBS Space Time with Dr. Matt O’Dowd” to break the subject. Garland spoke with Silicon Valley people, including coders at Quantum Labs. Which means that the series is, in some ways, true to contemporary American technology companies. However in the case of quantum computers, which have a finite number of existence, the “gods” roam around in an imaginary place.
“People who are doing quantum computers are not even keen to try to talk to ‘gods’,” says Garland. No. It has more underlying principles (in effect). “
Garland was interested in private tech companies, offalman character Forestland modeling age nocturnal hippies, beards and all. The director is skeptical about who puts him on the pedestal like Steve Jobs or Mark Zuckerberg, because tapping into the technology bubble will certainly not make you a scientific genius. It probably means you were in the right place with the right thing at the right time
It has some similarities with the “former machine” which in the future is a 10 year type.
“Devas” creator Alex Garland
“There is a line in the show where Forest is described as a genius and then someone says, ‘He’s not a genius, he’s an entrepreneur,’” Garland says. “I was interested in the idea that we define talent-driven qualities of people who run tech companies. I was thinking, ‘I’m not sure that’s true.’ Anything that made me dignified is inherently skeptical, but that’s why I thought some of these people weren’t geniuses. They are entrepreneurs. I was turning it off. The idea that Silicon Valley was more capitalist than we expected it to be was more than what we wanted to see. “
For Offerman, who jumped at the chance to work with Garland, the forest represents a character who is more attractive than just a villain.
Offerman says, “With the release of the eight episodes, your idea of ’who are the heroes and the antagonists?’ Has really weakened.” Which is really interesting, because I think it’s real life. Especially in this crazy political climate we want to make everything truly polarized. Is it right or wrong? What are you (expletive) Are you a Democrat? … You have finally come to learn why (Forest) He does what he does and it is quite understandable. You may or may not agree with his methods, but you may have some sympathy.
Mizuno felt the same way about his character. “Lily is surprised,” she says. “He is an outsider. He does not do what everyone else does. He does not participate in factionalism the way most people do. “
Peel, who wanted to study quantum mechanics after high school thanks to reading Gary Zukav’s “The Dancing Wu Lee Masters,” obliged the “gods” because it allowed deeper thinking than the average TV series. He read many before productions, including “A Brief History of Time” and David Foster Wallace’s “Everything and More: A Brief History of the Infinite,” and has been considering the philosophical implications of quantum computing ever since.
“Without thinking about these things, asking these questions for these projects was such a gift,” “because I think people like to think about these things. We forget that sometimes we have a lot of magic around on a regular basis … The challenge that Alex poses to his audience is that you will not be overwhelmed by science ‘
“We have the prerequisites to test our amazing abilities to create Alex’s technology and to further explore the vastness of physics,” says Ofman. “And then, naturally, the problems that we have to face. The great dualism of bipartisan primates is transferring to a smartphone: On the one hand you can do amazing things with it. And on the other hand, you can send your genital images to your intern and get into a lot of trouble.
In the end, “Gods” asks a lot of questions, but it’s in the context of a story about a group of people personally affected by science and technology. Garland keeps it private, because he believes that such high issues inherently affect each of us as personal, technological advancements and private technology companies grow. To him, science is a gateway to discussing what it means to be alive. The series may not provide any real answers, but it does allow viewers to consider what might happen
“(Science is) It is dry and boring and hard to understand and seems to have all the answers as all of this is contrary to what actually happened. “Most scientists talk more about something they don’t know. Science includes not only philosophy, but also poetry.
This is a syndicated post. Read the original post at Source link .