IonQ beat its technology roadmap projection by more than a year by demonstrating its ReconfigurableMulticore Quantum Architecture (RMQA). This technology should eventually allow IonQ to begin scaling large numbers of qubits. Moreover, IonQ has also delivered another chip technology ahead of schedule – RMQA will be implemented on a new quantum chip platform called Evaporated Glass Traps (EGTs).
Many technologies are used for quantum computers, such as superconductors, photonics, silicon-based, neutral atoms, trapped ions, and several others. IonQ’s present quantum technology of choice is natural ions created from an isotope of a rare-earth metal called ytterbium.
Just as classical computers use bits for computation, quantum computers use quantum bits or “qubits.” Ion qubits are created using precision lasers to remove an outer electron from an atom of ytterbium, which creates a positively charged ion whose internal workings act as a qubit. Once positioned in the trap, oscillating voltage fields hold the ions in place. This, and other laser manipulations of the ions, are all done inside a small vacuum chamber.
Presently, IonQ uses a single linear ion trap containing up to 32 ion qubits. This trap’s number of ion qubits may top out at about 50 to 60 qubits in a single chain of ions in the next 12-15 months. At that point, I expect IonQ to replace its linear trap with a new quantum processing unit that uses the RMQA and EGT trap. I previously wrote in Forbes about IonQ’s evolution to the new trap here.
Breaking down RMQA (Reconfigurable Multicore Quantum Architecture) to understandable terms:
- Reconfigurable refers to the system’s ability to move and combine smaller chains of ions into larger ion chains. This increases the computing power of the quantum processing unit. IonQ believes the EGT will eventually be able to support at least a triple-digit number of qubits on a single chip.
- Multicore describes the future ability to do quantum information processing on multiple distinct chains (or “cores”) of qubits contained in a single EGT. Multicore operation in IonQ’s architecture is enabled by reconfigurability.
This announcement was not paired with a supporting academic paper, but that is expected to come later. Dr. Robert Niffenegger, Assistant Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Massachusetts Amherst, said, “Certainly the new chip is impressive but without performance data… it is hard to determine how big of a step they’ve made.”
IonQ’s recent demonstration involved RMQA using 4 chains of 16 ions in an EGT Series ion trap chip. These ion chains were transported and merged into combinations of a higher-connectivity, 32-ion quantum computing core. The EGT series chips are expected to support more chains. Each chain will increase the quantum computational power by a factor of 4000 or more. The following IonQ video demonstrates the process:
Why having more qubits is important
So, why are IonQ and other quantum computer companies so interested in increasing the number of qubits?
Currently, the most powerful quantum computers in the world still can’t outperform a classical computer. Barring unexpected breakthroughs, most experts believe it will still be five to ten years before quantum machines can solve major problems like simulating large drug molecules, running huge quantum machine learning models, or providing millisecond trading solutions for stock options.
Quantum scientists have made amazing progress over the past two decades. However, for quantum machines to solve world-class problems, improvements are needed in three areas: error correction, gate fidelity, and qubit count. All three factors are interrelated and IonQ has researchers dedicated to all of them. Its researchers have made steady progress on both error correction and qubit fidelity which should allow incremental qubit scaling according to IonQ’s published roadmap. Unlike a classical computer that increases its power linearly with bits, a quantum computer doubles its power each time a qubit is added. For instance, a quantum computer with 16 qubits is 4,000 times more powerful than one with 4 qubits. Intuitively, it would seem like four times as many qubits would result in a quantum computer with four times as much power. That is true of classical computers, but a quantum computer increases its power exponentially with each additional qubit. That is why it only takes a few qubits to significantly increase the power of a quantum computer.
IonQ scientists believe that a quantum computer can eventually solve many problems beyond the computational capability of today’s supercomputers with as little as 72 error-corrected qubits, which is expected to take about 1,000 ion qubits in IonQ’s systems. Compared to IonQ’s existing 32 trapped ion computer, a 72 qubit machine would be about 1 trillion times more powerful.
If IonQ is correct, and if error correction can be solved, then an EGT trapped-ion chip containing a triple digit number of qubits will be an extremely powerful quantum machine capable of solving many significant problems.
- In 2016, ion trap vacuum chambers looked like large diving helmets. They have since evolved into much smaller devices through the years. The new Evaporated Glass Trap (EGT) is a small chip that can be held in the palm of a hand and can be operated at room temperature.
- Laser pulses are applied to entangle the qubits after ions merge and the 32-ion chain is formed.
- EGT allows ion chains to be scaled without loss of fidelity. Excess motion from the qubit transport is normally expected, so 4 out of 16 ions in each chain are reserved for cooling.
- The EGT ion trap chip provides stability necessary to operate RMQA with little to no recalibration. Lasers are known to charge substrates and create the need to make slight voltage adjustments to properly move the ion chains. EGT eliminates this problem, maximizing uptime and optimizing transport time.
Note: Moor Insights & Strategy writers and editors may have contributed to this article.
Moor Insights & Strategy, like all research and analyst firms, provides or has provided paid research, analysis, advising, or consulting to many high-tech companies in the industry, including 8×8, Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Applied Micro, ARM, Aruba Networks, AT&T, AWS, A-10 Strategies, Bitfusion, Blaize, Box, Broadcom, Calix, Cisco Systems, Clear Software, Cloudera, Clumio, Cognitive Systems, CompuCom, Dell, Dell EMC, Dell Technologies, Diablo Technologies, Digital Optics, Dreamchain, Echelon, Ericsson, Extreme Networks, Flex, Foxconn, Frame (now VMware), Fujitsu, Gen Z Consortium, Glue Networks, GlobalFoundries, Google (Nest-Revolve), Google Cloud, HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Honeywell, Huawei Technologies, IBM, Ion VR, Inseego, Infosys, Intel, Interdigital, Jabil Circuit, Konica Minolta, Lattice Semiconductor, Lenovo, Linux Foundation, MapBox, Marvell, Mavenir, Marseille Inc, Mayfair Equity, Meraki (Cisco), Mesophere, Microsoft, Mojo Networks, National Instruments, NetApp, Nightwatch, NOKIA (Alcatel-Lucent), Nortek, Novumind, NVIDIA, Nuvia, ON Semiconductor, ONUG, OpenStack Foundation, Oracle, Poly, Panasas, Peraso, Pexip, Pixelworks, Plume Design, Poly, Portworx, Pure Storage, Qualcomm, Rackspace, Rambus, Rayvolt E-Bikes, Red Hat, Residio, Samsung Electronics, SAP, SAS, Scale Computing, Schneider Electric, Silver Peak, SONY, Springpath, Spirent, Splunk, Sprint, Stratus Technologies, Symantec, Synaptics, Syniverse, Synopsys, Tanium, TE Connectivity, TensTorrent, Tobii Technology, T-Mobile, Twitter, Unity Technologies, UiPath, Verizon Communications, Vidyo, VMware, Wave Computing, Wellsmith, Xilinx, Zebra, Zededa, and Zoho which may be cited in blogs and research.
This is a syndicated post. Read the original post at Source link .